This is designed to be the "head over to" powder-or darn close to it- for just about any bottle-necked cartridge one particular could handload. It's the inspiration for a lot of pet loads, still I have never been content with the outcome.

H4831 will get the job done in the Swift although not real nicely. You can expect to by no means get the pressures you'll need for consistency Using the .223. 760, or H414 is going to be much better but for some purpose I ain't the biggest fan of most ball powders.

It really is probable that no further dialogue is required, through which circumstance we advise setting up a fresh thread. If nevertheless you're feeling your reaction is needed you may nonetheless accomplish that.

243, and several of the loads I've began with include, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am about to shoot the IMR7828 loads first, followed by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises when the H-4831sc loads present a shotgun sample! Who appreciates, I just may discover a use for it In fact.

In any case, I knew The 2 lbs . of H4831SC used exactly the same data, but I did not know regardless of whether there was everything unique involving a pound of powder labeled "Intense" and 1 not so labeled. A get in touch with to Hodgdon confirmed which they were actually identical and the only real change was the logo on the label.

Any load data to support that? My 1st imagined is it's not gonna melt away each of the way and velocities are going to be slow and in every single place. Could be a pleasant fireworks Exhibit!

VERIFY YOUR AGE Certain states prohibit advertising or marketing of firearms, ammunition, and linked firearm elements to minors. We’d like to make sure that you’re eighteen several years of age or older h4831sc load data in advance of enabling you to buy our site. Will you be 18 decades of age or older?

While this might be legitimate, there is a great deal extra to it than just not blowing on your own up. He could not strike prairie dogs past about 150 yards, so I'm guessing that inconsistent combustion wasn't carrying out everything favorable for his grouping capacity with Individuals loads.

dioni.a.312 said: In my practical experience the sole true distinction would be that the shortcut meters much better by reloading tools. Once It can be loaded theres no functional variation. I have heard that the shortcut could possibly have a tiny little bit quicker burn off price but It appears insignificant. Click to develop...

[electronic mail secured] gn and one hundred fifteen CT's, I have killed a lot more Deer using this type of combo than all the rifles I very own merged, h4831 vs h4831sc Do the job nearly this though the sweet location are going to be close to 54, I'm a Two Bit-06 nut and I've some stuff tat works really well for me When your intrigued

Despite the similarity in nomenclature, they're fully unique powders, with IMR 4831 remaining substantially speedier when compared to the Hodgdon variants. Don't treat them as exactly the same h4831sc load data powder, as they most undoubtedly usually are not.

This is often an Severe extruded propellant and gives heightened insensitivity to hot and cold temperatures.

Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my 300 WM but had far better speed and accuracy with H1000. I'd fairly make use of a slower burning powder with 215g drugs.

I could stack em in one gap but I wasn’t happy with the velocity. After months, I obtained lucky and caught some H1000 on line and naturally compensated just a little extra. The incredibly subsequent 7 days at a gun exhibit a guy had an entire scenario of H1000 for $forty for each 1lb. I forget about just how much, but with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a gentle load.